Lecteurs du Volume 41, 2018 / Referees for Volume 36, 2018
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Journal's annual list of referees for a volume; an acknowledgment artifact of peer review rather than any study, commentary, or announcement about research practice, and there is no abstract to judge from.
The record is a contextual list of referees associated with a journal volume.
Journal referee acknowledgment list; peer-review ecosystem furniture mapped as contextual, not an analytic study of review.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure
- Topic
- Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies
- Field
- Economics, Econometrics and Finance
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- Volume (thermodynamics)PhysicsThermodynamics
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no