MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230947679 · doi:10.1111/ene.13698

Oral Sessions

2018· article· en· W4230947679 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Neurology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNuclear PhysicsSt George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustBarts and The London School of Medicine and DentistryWarwick Medical SchoolUniversità degli Studi di GenovaUniversity College LondonUniversity of LeedsNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchUniversidade de LisboaUniversity of ManchesterUniversidad Técnica Federico Santa MaríaUniversity of WarwickUniversity of OttawaManchester Biomedical Research CentreKeele UniversityOttawa Hospital Research InstituteQueen Mary University of LondonAlnylam Pharmaceuticals
KeywordsMedicineCitationLibrary scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and aims: Acute Hepatic Porphyrias (AHPs) are rare, genetic diseases caused by mutations in the heme pathway. Central to AHPs is the upregulation of aminolevulinic acid synthase1 (ALAS1), the first, rate-limiting enzyme which causes accumulation of neurotoxic heme intermediates, aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and porphobilinogen (PBG). This results in life-threatening attacks and chronic, debilitating manifestations due to injury to the nervous systems, including neurovisceral pain, fatigue, and motor weakness. Methods: EXPLORE is the first observational study characterizing clinical management of patients with AHPs with 3 attacks/year, including patients receiving prophylactic treatment to prevent attacks. We will be presenting updated 12 month data. Results: 112 patients enrolled from 13 countries. Patients reported a mean of 9.3 attacks in 12 months prior to the study, with pain (99%), mood/sleep, and digestive (each 96%) symptoms being the most common. Annualized attack rate on study was 4.9 attacks/person, of which 77% required treatment. For those on hemin prophylactically, mean attack rate/person-year=4.0. Chronic symptoms were reported by 65% of patients, with pain (63%), mood/sleep (44%), and digestive (36%) manifestations most frequent. The EQ5D quality of life score was 66 (1-100); 35% had some difficulty walking and 57% had difficulty with usual activities or anxiety/depression. Mean ALA and PBG levels at screening (during non-attack) were increased to 8Xs and 20Xs ULN, respectively. Conclusion: EXPLORE demonstrates that patients suffer from chronic symptoms in addition to frequent attacks that decrease quality of life. Given morbidity and mortality, there remains an unmet need for novel therapies to prevent attacks and treat chronic symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of NeurologySame topicNeurology and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207