MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

2019 3rd International Conference on Manufacturing Technologies (ICMT)

2019· article· en· W4230957107 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelevance (law)Session (web analytics)Engineering ethicsQuality (philosophy)Face (sociological concept)Library scienceEngineeringEngineering managementPolitical scienceComputer scienceSociologyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preface The 2019 3rd International Conference on Manufacturing Technologies (ICMT2019) was held in held in San Francisco, USA during January 4-7, 2019. This volume consists of selected papers presented at ICMT 2019, which are addressing diverse topics related to recent trends in the inter-related areas of Mechanical, Manufacturing and Materials Engineering. The conference provides opportunities for the delegates to exchange new ideas and application through face-to-face discussions, to establish business or research relations and to find global partners for future collaborations. We hope that you will find its contents interesting, stimulating and educative. ICMT 2019 is organized by the South Asia Institute of Science and Engineering. The technical objective of the conference is to address key issues associated with science and technology in these rapidly evolving fields of research and to promote contact between basic researcher and technological needs for real industrial applications. The conference program offers invited, oral and poster presentations. The invited talks are focused on the potential application of mechanical, manufacturing, mechatronics and materials engineering in various fields. Many excellent manuscripts were selected after peer review and were recommended for publication in this volume. Topics cover all aspects of the areas listed above. I would like to thank the members of the conference committee, the reviewers who spared their valuable time, for their advice which have certainly helped to improve the quality, accuracy, relevance and to enhance the technical contributions of each paper selected for this conference program and volume for publication. And thank you to each author and participant who has contributed to the success of the conference. Prof. Dr. Ridha Ben Mrad University of Toronto, Canada January/4-7/2019

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.909

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and EngineeringSame topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207