MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

2019 3rd International Conference on Manufacturing Technologies (ICMT)

2019· article· en· W4230957107 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelevance (law)Session (web analytics)Engineering ethicsQuality (philosophy)Face (sociological concept)Library scienceEngineeringEngineering managementPolitical scienceComputer scienceSociologyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preface The 2019 3rd International Conference on Manufacturing Technologies (ICMT2019) was held in held in San Francisco, USA during January 4-7, 2019. This volume consists of selected papers presented at ICMT 2019, which are addressing diverse topics related to recent trends in the inter-related areas of Mechanical, Manufacturing and Materials Engineering. The conference provides opportunities for the delegates to exchange new ideas and application through face-to-face discussions, to establish business or research relations and to find global partners for future collaborations. We hope that you will find its contents interesting, stimulating and educative. ICMT 2019 is organized by the South Asia Institute of Science and Engineering. The technical objective of the conference is to address key issues associated with science and technology in these rapidly evolving fields of research and to promote contact between basic researcher and technological needs for real industrial applications. The conference program offers invited, oral and poster presentations. The invited talks are focused on the potential application of mechanical, manufacturing, mechatronics and materials engineering in various fields. Many excellent manuscripts were selected after peer review and were recommended for publication in this volume. Topics cover all aspects of the areas listed above. I would like to thank the members of the conference committee, the reviewers who spared their valuable time, for their advice which have certainly helped to improve the quality, accuracy, relevance and to enhance the technical contributions of each paper selected for this conference program and volume for publication. And thank you to each author and participant who has contributed to the success of the conference. Prof. Dr. Ridha Ben Mrad University of Toronto, Canada January/4-7/2019

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1730.155

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Materials Science and EngineeringSame topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207