Dynastic Marriage, Diplomatic Ceremonial and the Treaties of London (1604–05) and Antwerp (1609)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In early February 1609, the Spanish extraordinary ambassador Don Pedro de Toledo left Paris after failing spectacularly in his mandate to weaken the French government's support for the United Provinces. Don Pedro had arrived in France with a striking proposal: no less than a triple match between the Spanish branch of the house of Habsburg and the house of Bourbon. This tripartite proposal formed part of a larger set of interrelated Anglo-Spanish, Anglo-French and Franco-Spanish marriage discussions that began just after the birth of a French dauphin and Spanish infanta in 1601, continued during events celebrating the Anglo-Spanish peace treaty signed in 1604–05, and carried on via Don Pedro's embassy – eventually resulting in the royal marriages of 1615 between France and Spain and 1625 between France and England. This essay situates events leading up to Don Pedro's departure within this broader context of French, Spanish and English foreign policy considerations. Applying William Roosen's notion of ‘stroking’ via early modern diplomatic ceremonial, it also highlights some of the complex and multifaceted ways in which pre-modern diplomatic relations made use of dynastic marriage proposals. A crucial backdrop framing Don Pedro's reception in France was Henri IV's pressing need for peace at home, after thirty-five years of civil war, in order to restore the kingdom's economic solvency and political stability. In 1598, the Treaty of Vervins had put an end to the country's longstanding war against Spain, but with this action France divided itself from England and the United Provinces, who two years earlier had signed the Treaty of Greenwich according to which all three had gained the promise of mutual military support. Thereafter, and for the remainder of Henri IV's life, France and Spain engaged in what might be called a cold war: Philip III persisted in inciting conspiracies against Henri's legitimacy and even his life, while the king of France worked behind the scenes to undermine Habsburg interests, supporting the Moriscos in a plot against the Spanish crown and aiding the United Provinces with financial subsidies and by allowing the Dutch to recruit soldiers within French territory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".