Bibliographic record
VenueAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal case studies and regulations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of SydneyInstituto De Saúde Pública, Universidade do PortoNational Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentFeinstein Institutes for Medical ResearchHouston Methodist Research InstituteMorsani College of MedicineLeonard M. Miller School of MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillMedical Center, University of PittsburghSchool of Medicine, University of South CarolinaCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversitySchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillFogarty International CenterUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences CenterNational Institutes of HealthSchool of Medicine, Duke UniversityAssistance publique-Hôpitaux de ParisPontificia Universidad JaverianaTanta UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversitat de BarcelonaUniversité Paris DescartesHebrew University of JerusalemMedical Center, University of RochesterMenofia UniversityFetal Medicine FoundationInha UniversityCairo UniversityMonash UniversityInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicalePerelman School of Medicine, University of PennsylvaniaSchool of Medicine, New York UniversityInha University HospitalInvitaeOchsner HealthEastern Virginia Medical SchoolUniversity of MinnesotaInova Health SystemUniversity of OxfordMcMaster UniversityBen-Gurion University of the NegevDrexel UniversityNorthShore University HealthSystemUniversità degli Studi di ParmaJewish General HospitalUniversity of Missouri-Kansas CityNorges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige UniversitetEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichUniversità Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio EmilaUniversity of South FloridaUniversity of MiamiUniversity of South CarolinaOregon National Primate Research CenterMcGill UniversitySchool of Medicine, Indiana UniversityUniversity of PittsburghUniversity of WashingtonJohns Hopkins UniversityHouston Methodist HospitalCase Western Reserve UniversityUniversity of Nevada, Las VegasUniversity of RochesterUniversity of MissouriUniversidade do PortoNorthwestern UniversityInstitute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of MichiganUniversidade de São PauloChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaNYU Langone Medical CenterCollege of Medicine, Drexel UniversityMidwestern UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaGeorgetown UniversityFlorida Department of HealthAin Shams UniversityUtah Department of HealthOhio State UniversityUniversity of OklahomaUniversity of Southern CaliforniaMichigan State UniversityUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico IIKaiser PermanenteEmory UniversityUniversity of TorontoImperial College LondonNorthwell HealthSchool of Medicine, Emory UniversityHealth Science Center, University of TennesseeInstitut de Cardiologie de MontréalUniversity of OttawaIntermountain Healthcare
KeywordsMedicineIndex (typography)World Wide Web
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.202
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".
Quick stats
Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractno