51st ISCEV international symposium abstract issue
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flash VEPs were abnormal in a cohort of 100 neonates exposed to maintenance methadone in utero. We now describe clinical visual and electrophysiological outcomes at six months. Methods Visual assessment included modified Atkinson test battery; strabismus, nystagmus, reduced visual acuity, delayed visual maturation or refractive error ([ 3 dioptres) defined a failure. Pattern onset VEPs were recorded to 120 0 , 60 0 and 15 0 checks. Results 81 drug-exposed and 26 comparison infants (79 and 52 % of the original cohorts) were assessed at a median age of 27 weeks (range 26-30). 90 % of drug-exposed infants had been additionally exposed to illicit drugs and 26 % to excess alcohol in utero. 40 % of the drug-exposed cohort failed clinical visual assessment: the relative risk of abnormal assessment was 5.1 (95 % CI 1.3-20; p = 0.02). Nystagmus was particularly common. VEP peak times were slower and amplitudes smaller in drug-exposed infants, of whom 70 % had one or more abnormal VEP parameter. Abnormal visual outcome at six months was not associated with the pattern of additional drug exposure nor with a history of neonatal abstinence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".