MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4231085890 · doi:10.1182/blood.v110.11.360.360

Follicular Lymphomas with and without Translocation t(14;18) Differ in Gene Expression Profiles and Genetic Alterations.

2007· article· en· W4231085890 on OpenAlexaff
Ellen Leich, Itziar Salaverría, Sı́lvia Beà, Andreas Zettl, Randy D. Gascoyne, Wing-Chung Chan, Rita M. Braziel, Lisa M. Rimsza, Dennis D. Weisenburger, Jan Delabie, Elaine S. Jaffe, T. Andrew Lister, A. J. Norton, Louis M. Staudt, Elena Hartmann, Hans-Konrad Mueller-Hermelink, Elı́as Campo, German Ott, Andreas Rosenwald

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromosomal translocationFollicular lymphomaFluorescence in situ hybridizationBiologyComparative genomic hybridizationMolecular biologyLymphomaclone (Java method)In situ hybridizationImmunohistochemistryGeneGene expressionGeneticsChromosomeImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma that is characterized in approximately 85% of cases by the chromosomal translocation t(14;18) involving BCL2. While FL3b generally lack the t(14;18), this translocation is also absent in 15% of FL grades 1, 2 and 3a. The current study was designed to identify the frequency of t(14;18)-negative FL in a series of 166 cases of FL1, 2 and 3a in which global gene expression profiles had been established previously (Dave et al., NEJM351:2159–69, 2004). Furthermore, we sought to compare genetic alterations and gene expression profiles between FL with and without the t(14;18). Combined polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and tissue microarray-based fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) identified 17 t(14;18)-negative FL cases in this series (9%). Virtually all FL cases carrying the t(14;18) showed BCL2 expression by immunohistochemistry (Dako, clone 124), whereas 11 of the FL cases without a t(14;18) were BCL2-negative at the protein level. Clinically, there was no difference between the t(14;18)-negative and -positive FL subgroups regarding age and gender distribution as well as in median survival times. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in the 166 FL cases revealed a characteristic pattern of chromosomal gains and losses, as previously described. However, significant differences were observed between the t(14;18)-negative and -positive FL subgroups. Specifically, the t(14;18)-positive FL subgroup showed gains of chromosomes 18q (18%), 8q (12%) and X (13%), as well as losses of 13q (16%) and 10q (16%), whereas none of these aberrations were observed in the t(14;18)-negative FL cases. To compare gene expression between the two groups, we used gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), BRB array tools and a two-sided t-test. Cell cycle-associated genes were found to be enriched in the t(14;18)-negative FL subset. These differences were even more pronounced in FL cases that lacked both the t(14;18) and BCL2 expression at the protein level. Importantly, genes expressed in non-malignant bystander cells appeared also differentially enriched and a cytotoxic gene expression signature was found to be more prominent in t(14;18)-negative FL. These findings point to a different composition of the non-neoplastic cells in t(14;18)-positive and -negative FL and could indicate subtle differences in the immunological microenvironment of t(14;18)-negative FL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→