Quantitative outcrop analysis and modelling of the Triassic fluvial Wolfville Formation (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sub-surface reservoirs are normally characterised by limited information from widely spaced wells (1D sections) and relative low-resolution seismic data (2D or 3D sections) making any derived geological model highly interpretive. The ability of outcrop exposures to study the sedimentary architecture (e.g. stacking patterns, lateral continuation, facies proportions and distribution) at a wide range of scales (km to mm) in continuous 3D accessible sections make them ideal analogues to help bridge the gap in resolution between seismic and well data in reservoir studies.In this study the sedimentary architecture of the outcrop exposures the Late Triassic Wolfville Formation are evaluated using traditional sedimentological (e.g. correlation panels, log sections) and digital (e.g. DGPS, LiDAR, DEM) field techniques to help better understand these often complex fluvial depositional systems for analogue reservoir studies. The sediments of the Wolfville Formation are superbly exposed in both cliff sections and on extensive wave-cut platforms along the shore of the Minas Basin (Nova Scotia, Canada). The succession lies unconformably on Pre-Triassic rocks and forms the earliest syn-rift unit in the Fundy basin. The unit comprises coarse- and fine-grained fluvial sandstones, aeolian dune deposits, and alluvial fan sediments. The laterally extensive and three-dimensional nature of the outcrop exposures offer a valuable insight in the sedimentary architecture of the fluvial system. A detailed sedimentological analysis of the succession allowed the determination of the large-scale sedimentary architecture of this gravelly to sandy bedload fluvial system. In order to characterise the architectural evolution in more detail digital outcrop studies were employed in three carefully selected study areas. The study areas are located along the southern Minas Basin shore within the gravelly and younger sandy-dominated part of the succession.The digital outcrop studies carried out in the study areas collected spatial data using differential GPS and LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) equipment. The integration of traditional collected geological and spatial data forms digital outcrop models (DOMs), which allow accurate mapping and evaluation of the geological properties geometry and distribution using novel spatial analysis techniques (e.g. classified point-cloud and perpendicular projection plane method). The results offer a better understanding on the heterogeneity of the depositional system, accurate geostatistical information on the characteristics of sedimentary bodies and genetic units (geometry, distribution and proportion) and provides a high-resolution stratigraphic-structural framework for geocellular outcrop models. In the geocellular outcrop models of the study areas the three-dimensional facies distribution are simulated using various modelling approaches, such as sequential indicator simulations, object modelling and multiple point statistics. The available control of the outcrop models allowed the various facies modelling approaches to be examined. The results are evaluated and discussed using qualitative comparison studies. In addition, these outcrop models provided detailed information on the three-dimensional fluvial architecture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".