MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231139434 · doi:10.1093/icvts/ivv204.204

P-204ROLE OF EXTRACORPOREAL LIFE SUPPORT AFTER PULMONARY ENDARTERECTOMY: A SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE

2015· article· en· W4231139434 on OpenAlexaff
Laura Donahoe, John Granton, K. Mcrae, John Thenganatt, J. Moric, S. Keshavjee, Marc de Perrot

Bibliographic record

VenueInteractive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineExtracorporealLife supportExtracorporeal circulationExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationSurgeryCardiologyInternal medicineIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS) for rescue after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) has become a viable option. This study aims to present a single centre experience looking at the indications, risk factors and outcome of ECLS after PEA. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing PEA from Jan 2008 to Dec 2014 in our institution. Results: Among 144 consecutive patients undergoing PEA for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, 6 (4%) received ECLS postoperatively for right ventricular (RV) failure (n = 3), severe hypoxemia (n = 2), and hemorrhagic pulmonary edema (n = 1). ECLS configuration was central veno-arterial (cVA) in 3 patients, peripheral VA (pVA) in 1 and veno-venous (VV) in 2. One patient with cVA was switched to VV after 5 days. Overall ECLS duration ranged between 3 and 39 (median 5) days. ECLS patients had higher preoperative total pulmonary vascular resistance (TPR) compared to non-ECLS patients (1477 ± 671 Dynes.s.cm−5 vs 954 ± 462 Dynes.s.cm−5, P = 0.009) and more frequently required hospital admission for RV failure before surgery (50% vs 9%, P = 0.02). All patients requiring VA ECLS had a preoperative TPR >1200 Dynes.s.cm−5. Non-significant differences were found for preoperative 6' walk distance (341 ± 193 m vs 375 ± 132 m, P = 0.5) and brain natriuretic peptide (391 ± 611 pg/ml vs 277 ± 367 pg/ml, P = 0.5). The overall in-hospital mortality rate for all patients was 2% (3/144), including the ECLS patient on pVA. The remaining 5 ECLS patients (83%) were discharged from hospital and are alive after a median follow-up of 7 (range 2-23) months. Two ECLS patients (40%) are on therapy for residual PH compared to 13 (10%) in the non-ECLS patients (P = 0.09). Conclusions: ECLS is a safe and important rescue option after PEA. cVA configuration is theoretically favoured in that it temporarily decreases the total flow through the damaged post-endarterectomy pulmonary vasculature. The use of ECLS may expand eligibility for PEA by allowing sicker patients to undergo surgery with good results. Disclosure: No significant relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.817

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInteractive Cardiovascular and Thoracic SurgerySame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207