Some Stress Aspects from Psycho-biophysical Point of View
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Selye published his famous theory of the stress in Nature in 1936. For the stress motto is the inscription at the main entrance of the Institute of Experimental Medicine and Surgery (Montreal): “Neither the prestige of your subject, and the power of your instruments, nor the extent of your learned¬ness and the precision of your planning, can substitute for the originality of your approach and the keenness of your observation.” The stress in the human organism is a perturbation. This perturbation is regulates by negative feedback. All physiological parameters characterizing the organism oscillate between a minimum and maximum value. The stress is properly a general adaptational answer rised under the influence of some stressor, with characteristic but not specific changes. The organism can, in general, get along namely by switching on also another regulatory mechanism for the convienent control of the altered physiological parameter. All these surplus regulations need excees-energy from the side of the organism, contribute to wear it and for this very reason accelerate the process, of aging. We use the Le-Chatelier principle and determine the measure of psychical organization. For the all laboratorial parameters exists five zones: optimum (1), admissible (2a., 2b.), dangerous (3a., 3b.), inactivity (4a., 4b.) and inviability (5a., 5b.). As a conclusion, the present medical science reserves the word perinormal for naming biophysical, biochemical and physiological responses in a wide range that warn us referring to the existence of mainly quantitative or reversible qualitative changes and the possibility of irreversibly pathological qualitative alterations. We presented of the biophysical modeling of the creativity and talk over the psychological balance of the man.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it