MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231270837 · doi:10.35767/gscpgbull.68.4.141

Lithostratigraphic revision and biostratigraphy of Upper Hauterivian–Barremian strata from the Kugmallit Trough, Mackenzie Delta, Northwest Territories

2020· article· en· W4231270837 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
D H McNeil, J Dixon, Ziyi Xiu, S.P. Fowler

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyPaleontologyTrough (economics)ForaminiferaMarine transgressionUnconformityOutcropOnlapDeltaBiostratigraphySiltstoneCretaceousFaciesStructural basinOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Kipnik Formation, named herein, is defined from the Late Hauterivian to Barremian Kugmallit Trough in the Mackenzie Delta, Arctic Canada. The trough was formed by extensional tectonics associated with the opening of the Canada Basin and was infilled by kilometre-thick accumulations of clastic sediments. Samples from the Kugmallit Trough are known only from two exploration wells – Shell Kipnik O-20 and Gulf Mobil Ogruknang M-31. Examination of palynomorphs, foraminifera, and ostracods from cuttings of these wells, integrated with regional subsurface and outcrop correlations, indicated that the existing subsurface stratigraphic interpretations [Upper Jurassic to Barremian] of the Kugmallit Trough were in need of revision. The revised Upper Hauterivian–Barremian succession thus consists of the Siku, Kipnik (new), and Mount Goodenough formations. The Siku and Kipnik formations are known only from the subsurface, but the Mt. Goodenough Formation is widespread and was deposited over a regional unconformity. The Siku to Kipnik deposition is a large-scale transgressive-regressive succession that represents deposition during a period of initial subsidence (transgression) followed by uplift and erosion (regression). The shale dominant Siku Formation contains a distinctive unnamed foraminiferal assemblage that consists of agglutinated species typical of offshore or deeper water. Ostracods of the Siku Formation are contained in the informal Galliaecytheridea postsinuata zone, which is confined to the Siku Formation. Ostracods of the G. postsinuata zone suggest shelf environments. The Kipnik Formation is sand-dominant with thin beds of shale, siltstone and coal. Agglutinated foraminifera occur sparsely because of coarse, rapid sedimentation. Inner shelf environments are suggested by the foraminifera. The lower half of the Mount Goodenough Formation is shale-dominant and the upper half consists of intercalated shale and sandstone. Foraminifera and ostracods occur abundantly in the Mt. Goodenough subsurface and outcrops of the Richardson Mountains. The foraminiferal Convallina mcneili Zone of Barremian age occurs in the Mt. -Goodenough Formation and its composition of agglutinated and calcareous benthic foraminifera suggests outer shelf or deeper environments. Ostracods of the Mt. Goodenough Formation in subsurface and outcrop are assigned to the informal Clithrocytheridea spp. zone. Ostracods suggest an outer shelf or deeper-water environment. Palynomorphs indicate that the Siku Formation is Late Hauterivian, the Kipnik Formation is probably latest Hauterivian to Early Barremian, and the Mount Goodenough Formation is Barremian.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Canadian Petroleum GeologySame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207