Radicular Pain After Vertebroplasty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Study Design. During vertebroplasty (VP), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) may leak into the posterior epidural venus plexus, provoking symptoms ranging from radicular pain to medullar compression. Objectives. To propose and test the feasibility of a procedure (cooling system) to prevent radicular irritation caused by foraminal PMMA leakage. Summary of Background Data. Foraminal leak of PMMA, as observed during VP, may lead to radiculalgia. Several mechanisms of nerve root irritation have been proposed. Considering heat or local chemical irritation has led us to treat immediately by local periradicular irrigation with a cooling liquid. Methods. Four consecutive patients with observed foraminal leakage were treated by local fluid injection. Immediately after observation of a foraminal leak, a 20-gauge Chiba needle was positioned to reach the foramen. Ten cubic centimeters of lidocaine (0.2%) was followed by 100–200 cc of pressurized saline perfusion within 10–20 minutes (cooling system). Results. In all patients with foraminal leakage, no radicular pain existed after application of the cooling system. No complications were observed with its use. Conclusion. In presence of a foraminal leakage, the immediate application of a cooling irrigation may protect the root from injury, which is explained by the hypothesis that the main mechanism of injury may be more related to heat or chemical irritation of the nerve than compression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".