In Situ Size Distribution of Suspended Particles in the Fraser River
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Size distributions of suspended sediment particles under low flow conditions in the Fraser River were measured using a submersible laser instrument. By comparing the in situ size distribution measured using this instrument with the size distribution of primary particles (measured by collecting sediment samples and analyzing them for size distribution after dispersing the particles by ultrasonic vibration), it was concluded that suspended sediment particles in the Fraser River downstream of pulp mill effluent outfalls are transported as agglomerations of particles (flocs) rather than as individual particles. Flocculation of river sediments in estuaries has been investigated in earlier studies, which show that saltwater intrusion contributes to the flocculation mechanism. Freshwater flocculation, such as the one observed in the present study, also has been reported in the literature, and it is attributed to the presence of organic materials and other contaminants from industrial and sewage treatment plant effluents. This paper describes the details of the submersible laser instrument and its use in the Fraser River, British Columbia, Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it