MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231416453 · doi:10.33915/etd.5625

Insights into the Assembly of Arctic Alaska: Provenance and Geochemical Data from the Doonerak Fenster and Endicott Mountains Allochthon

2017· dissertation· en· W4231416453 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
William Patrick Frier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllochthonGeologySiliciclasticLaurentiaDetritusProvenanceGeochemistryVolcanic rockZirconPopulationPaleontologyPaleozoicNappeVolcano

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Doonerak fenster of the central Brooks Range contains the Apoon assemblage, a suite of Early Paleozoic mafic-to-intermediate volcanic and siliciclastic rocks. The fenster exposes deep structural levels of the Brooks Range between regions of Laurentian and non-Laurentian origin in Arctic Alaska. During the Mesozoic to Cenozoic formation of the Brooks Range, Upper Devonian to Triassic siliciclastic and carbonate rocks of the Endicott Mountains allochthon were thrusted northward and juxtaposed over the top of this volcanic suite.;New geochemical data indicates that the Apoon assemblage formed as part of an island arc complex. The assemblage contains basaltic-to-andesitic rocks with diverse textures, including pillow basalts and cross-cutting dikes and sills. Enrichment in large ion lithophile elements (e.g. Cs, Rb, Ba, Th), depletion in high field strength elements (e.g. Nb, P, Zr, Ti), and chondrite-normalized rare-earth element (REE) trends within the Apoon volcanics are consistent with formation in an island arc setting and corroborate previous work.;Detrital zircon spectra from volcaniclastic portions of the Apoon assemblage show a prominent unimodal 440--530 Ma population centered on 504 Ma with only minor populations potentially derived from Laurentia. The siliciclastic units unconformably overlying the Apoon assemblage (Ellesmerian sequence) and those of the Endicott Mountains allochthon mostly lack detritus from this 504 Ma population and are instead dominated by 400--440 Ma populations centered on ~420 Ma. While this is dissimilar from the Apoon assemblage, detritus of this age is common in rocks of the Canadian Arctic, Svalbard, and eastern Greenland and is associated with the Caledonian orogeny.;The coexistence of Caledonian detritus alongside 800--550 Ma populations within samples from the northern margin of the fenster also indicates a connection to the Timanian orogen of northern Baltica. The youngest portions of the Apoon assemblage also show significant Laurentian and Caledonian age detritus. This shift in provenance could be explained by the closure of an oceanic basin, providing newly integrated sediment pathways. Collectively, evidence presented here indicates that the Apoon assemblage formed as part of an island arc, which initially formed in a relatively isolated geographic position and received detritus from mostly proximal sources (single unimodal 504 Ma population). This arc progressively approached and eventually docked onto the margin of northwest Laurentian during closure of the northernmost Iapetus Ocean, eventually amalgamating regions of Laurentian and non-Laurentian origin. Thus, the Doonerak fenster preserves an island arc complex and marks the location of a Paleozoic suture between Laurentian and non-Laurentian portions of Arctic

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207