MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231512947 · doi:10.33772/jpmit.v3i1.19635

Pendampingan Pembuatan Wastafel Portable Pedal Kaki Bagi Bengkel Las Sebagai Upaya Memutus Penyebaran Covid-19

2021· article· id· W4231512947 on OpenAlexaff
Budiman Sudia, Aminur Aminur, Ridway Balaka, Samhuddin Samhuddin, La Hasanudin, Abd Kadir

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Ilmu Terapan (JPMIT) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pandemik Covid-19 masih terus berlangsung sejak pertama kali terdeteksi di Wuhan, China, akhirDesember 2019. Pola penyebarannya kian meningkat dan tidak mengenal umur serta iklim sehinggaberbagai negara memberlakukan aturan protokoler kesehatan yang ketat Social Distancing, PhysicalDistancing, anjuran memakai masker dan tak kala pentingnya sesering mungkin mencuci tangan.Kegiatan pengabdian pendampingan pembuatan wastafel portable merupakan wujud kolaborasiantara bengkel las dan akademisi Teknik Mesin Universitas Halu Oleo Kendari. Metode pengabdianmemberikan pendampingan pembuatan wastafel bagi tukang las dalam rangka memutus penyebaranCovid-19 yang telah memasuki Era New Normal di Wilayah Kendari. Hasil pengabdian terlaksanadengan baik dalam suasana pandemik Covid-19 dengan tetap memperhatikan protokol kesehatan,pihak mitra Bengkel Las Mekar Surya dan Bengkel Las Fajar sangat antuasias mengikuti programpendampigan. Program pendampingan ini juga melibatkan mahasiswa yang memiliki kompentensilas, sehingga melalui pengabdian dapat terjalin saling tukar informasi dan pengalaman kerja sebagaisolusi meningkatkan kreativitas dan inovasi bagi bengkel las dimasa pandemik Covid-19 di KotaKendari.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0780.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Ilmu Terapan (JPMIT)Same topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207