MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231535296 · doi:10.1385/1-59259-183-3:199

Cadherins

2003· article· en· W4231535296 on OpenAlexaff
Jean‐René Alattia, Kit I. Tong, Masatoshi Takeichi, Mitsuhiko Ikura

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCadherinCell biologyIntracellularCell adhesion moleculeCateninCytoskeletonExtracellularCell adhesionBiologyActinChemistryCellBiochemistrySignal transductionWnt signaling pathway

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is now firmly established that calcium is a key component of cellular adhesiveness, as shown from live tissues and cultured cells dissociating whenever exposed to a calcium-depleted environment (1). Cadherins are Ca2+-dependent cell-adhesion molecules that bind homotypically to identical cadherin molecules on opposing cells (2). The homotypic adhesion and Ca2+-binding activities reside in the extracellular region of cadherins, whereas the intracellular domain, together with adapter proteins such as α-, β-, and γ-catenins, is responsible for linking cadherin to cytoskeletal actin filaments. The coordinated intercellular and intracellular protein-protein interactions are crucial for the formation of tissue structure and the proper physiological functioning of tissues (3). Recent reviews have compiled the findings of several structural studies showing the intricate partnership between calcium binding and protein-protein interactions in cadherins (4,5). In this chapter, we will describe a variety of techniques that have been employed to study the function and structure of cadherin molecules. Because there is an excellent review of the protocols for the investigation of cadherin cellular functions (6), we will focus on the molecular and structural studies of this family of Ca2+-binding proteins. A brief description of a cell aggregation assays and its inhibition has also been provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerFrench-language works237,207