MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231671736 · doi:10.7202/1062403ar

Out of the Closet: Dramatic Works by Sarah Anne Curzon Part Two. Re-Dressing Gender Inequality: The Sweet Girl Graduate

2019· article· en· W4231671736 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Céleste Derksen

Bibliographic record

VenueTheatre Research in Canada · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Gender and Feminism Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClosetGirlArtHumanitiesDramaArgument (complex analysis)Art historyLiteratureHistoryPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This second of a two-part essay on Sarah Anne Curzon's "closet drama" examines the novel and duplicitous effects of cross-dressing in The Sweet Girl Graduate. The essay argues that Curzon's play is unique in the theatrical tradition of cross-dressing, first because it provides an extended political argument for the expansion of women's educational privileges and, second, because it displaces the male gaze in order to dramatize female use of, and response to, the cross-dressed body. Cette seconde partie de l'essai de Céleste Derksen sur les pièces de "théâtre à lire" de Sarah Anne Curzon étudie les effets nouveaux et ambigus du travestissment théâtral dans The Sweet Girl Graduate. Cet essaie montre que la pièce de Curzon est unique dans la tradition théâtrale du travestissment parce que, d'une part, elle apporte un argument politique de poids en faveur de l'augmentation des privilèges des femmes en matière de formation et que, d'autre part, elle déloge le regard du mâle pour mettre en évidence l'usage du corps travesti par les femmes ainsi que leur réaction à ce corps travesti.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0130.008
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.236
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheatre Research in CanadaSame topicHistorical Gender and Feminism StudiesFrench-language works237,207