Purification, cloning, and DNA sequence analysis of a chitinase from an overproducing mutant of <i>Streptomyces peucetius </i>defective in daunorubicin biosynthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Extracellular chitinases of Streptomyces peucetius and a chitinase overproducing mutant, SPVI, were purified to homogeneity by ion exchange and gel filtration chromatography. The purified enzyme has a molecular mass of 42 kDa on SDS-PAGE, and the N-terminal amino acid sequence of the protein from the wild type showed homology to catalytic domains (Domain IV) of several other Streptomyces chitinases such as S. lividans 66, S. coelicolor A3(2), S. plicatus, and S. thermoviolaceus OPC-520. Purified SPVI chitinase cross-reacted to anti-chitinase antibodies of wild-type S. peucetius chitinase. A genomic library of SPVI constructed in E. coli using λ DASH II was probed with chiC of S. lividans 66 to screen for the chitinase gene. A 2.7 kb fragment containing the chitinase gene was subcloned from a λ DASH II clone, and sequenced. The deduced protein had a molecular mass of 68 kDa, and showed domain organization similar to that of S. lividans 66 chiC. The N-terminal amino acid sequence of the purified S. peucetius chitinase matched with the N-terminus of the catalytic domain, indicating the proteolytic processing of 68 kDa chitinase precursor protein to 42 kDa mature chitinase containing the catalytic domain only. A putative chiR sequence of a two-component regulatory system was found upstream of the chiC sequence.Key words: chitinase, chitinase purification, Streptomyces peucetius, daunorubicin, chiC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".