Bibliographic record
Abstract
OREGONSCAPE THE APPLEGATE BROTHERS, Charles,Jesse,and Lindsay,came to Oregon with their families during the great migration of 1843. After brief stops at Fort Vancouver and near Salem, they settled near Dallas for a few years. In about 1850, all three moved to a small community in northern Douglas County, which Jesse named Yoncalla. According to Oregon Geographic Names, the name came from a Native American phrase meaning ‘the home of the eagles.’ By 1856, Charles and his wife, Melinda Miller Applegate, had finished building the two-story home pictured above from local lumber, brick, and sandstone. They raised fifteen children there. Among their neighbors were the families of Jesse and Lindsay, who each raised eleven children. Charles passed away in 1879,at the age of seventy-three,and Melinda followed him in 1888.The house stayed in the family through the following decades. In 1947, descendants of the Applegate, Huntington, and Miller pioneer families began to hold an annual reunion. This photograph is of the 1956 reunion that celebrated the one-hundredth anniversary of the completion of the Charles Applegate house. More than 150 people came from Nevada, California, Washington, and even Mexico as well as Oregon towns from Ashland to Portland to Fossil.A list of attendees is available online at the link below. — Mikki Tint, former special collections librarian, OHS Research Library Over one hundred people gathered at the Applegate homestead in 1956 for a family reunion. OHS digital no. bb011969 Learn more about the photograph at www.ohs.org/research/quarterly/oregonscape.cfm. ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.811 | 0.503 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".