Experimental and Numerical Demonstration on the Gain and Power Saturation of Yb-Doped Double-Clad Fiber Amplifiers in Multiwavelength CW and Ultrafast Pulsed Operation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experimental studies on gain and saturation of a Yb-doped double-cladding fiber amplifier accompanied with and interpreted by rigorous numerical simulations are presented. The saturation power, the value, and the spectral asymmetry of the output signal are experimentally characterized in both pulsed and continuous wave (CW) operation, and then, verified and interpreted numerically. Power conversion efficiency and quantum conversion efficiency of the amplifier are measured to be up to 55% and 58%, respectively. It is the first time, to the best of our knowledge, to demonstrate a numerical model for the pulsed operation based on the interaction of vector coupled nonlinear Schrodinger equations and the rate equations of the Yb-doped double-clad fiber taking into account all high-order dispersion parameters and the variation of gain coefficient during pulse propagation. A good agreement between numerical and experimental results is observed providing interpretations to the results. The numerical models and the experimental demonstrations provide guidance for the design and analysis of Yb-doped double-cladding fiber amplifiers both in pulsed and CW operation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".