Defining culture in government: subcultures within the BC Ministry of Environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A strong and effective organizational culture is critical for the success of an organization. This project is intended to facilitate and support a cultural transition within the Ministry of Environment towards its goal of becoming a High-Performing, Flexible and Resilient Organization. In order to accomplish this, the existing culture within the organization must be defined. The initial component of the project is a detailed literature review. The literature review is focused on the following three main areas: methods to determine organizational culture, culture in the public service, and organizational sub-cultures. The literature review is intended to support and provide rationale for designing the culture within the Ministry of Environment. Based on information gleaned from the literature review, the project proceeds to define the culture within two work units of the Ministry of Environment. The project also defines the characteristics of a High-Performing, Flexible and Resilient Organization as a cultural assessment is of little value unless it is linked to an organizational problem or issue. The cultural model and assessment methodology chosen to define culture of two work units within the Environmental Protection division of the Ministry of Environment was based on the framework defined by Edgar H. Schein. Schein's cultural model has three levels: artifacts, espoused values, and shared assumptions. Based on the high degree of similarity in the results from the two focus groups, four cultural themes were identified within the Ministry of Environment. These themes are intricately linked through underlying elements such as passion, and communication therefore the themes reflect a cultural continuum as opposed to singular stand alone components. The four cultural themes identified include: Clan Mentality, Bureaucracy and Organizational Goals, Organizational Passion, and Communication. The alignment of the cultural themes between the focus groups precludes the designation of independent geographical sub-cultu
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".