MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231807612 · doi:10.1017/s0261444802221898

Language learning

2003· article· en· W4231807612 on OpenAlexaffabout
A Georges, James M. Hudson, Amy And Bruckman

Bibliographic record

VenueLanguage Teaching · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Canadian institutionsTrinity Western University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsycholinguisticsPsychologySecond-language acquisitionLinguisticsForeign languageHumanitiesPedagogyArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

03–88Akamatsu, Nobuhiko (Doshisha U., Kyoto, Japan; Email: nakamats@mail.doshisha.ac.jp ). A similarity in word-recognition procedures among second language readers with different first language backgrounds. Applied Psycholinguistics (Cambridge, UK), 23, 1 (2002), 117–33. 03–89Appel, Christine (Dublin City U., Ireland; Email: christine.appel@dcu.ie ) and Gilabert, Roger. Motivation and task performance in a task-based web-based tandem project. ReCALL (Cambridge, UK), 14, 1 (2002), 16–31. 03–90Arnaud, C. (U. of Barcelona, Spain). L'implication de l'apprenant en classe de langue étrangère. [Personal involvement as a factor in the foreign language learner's classroom performance.] Mélanges CRAPEL (Nancy, France), 26 (2001), 39–62. 03–91Bang, Youngjoo (Myongji U., Seoul, Korea; Email: yjbang@mju.ac.kr ). The use of collaborative work in a college EFL reading classroom. English Teaching (Korea), 57, 3 (2002), 145–69. 03–92Barbieri, Federica (U. of Iowa, USA). The contribution of computer learner corpora to second language acquisition research: A review. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata (Rome, Italy), 33, 2/3 (2001), 219–39. 03–93Barcroft, Joe (Washington U., USA; Email: barcroft@artsci.wustl.edu ). Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning (Malden, MA, USA), 52, 2 (2002), 323–63. 03–94Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen (Indiana U., USA; Email: bardovi@indiana.edu ). A new starting point? Investigating formulaic use and input in future expression. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (New York, USA), 24, 2 (2002), 189–98. 03–95Biesenbach-Lucas, Sigrun (American U., Washington, USA; Email: sblucas@american.edu ) and Weasenforth, Donald. Virtual office hours: Negotiation strategies in electronic conferencing. Computer Assisted Language Learning (Lisse, The Netherlands), 15, 2 (2002), 147–65. 03–96Bley-Vroman, Robert (U. of Hawai'i, USA; Email: vroman@hawaii.edu ). Frequency in production, comprehension, and acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (New York, USA), 24, 2 (2002), 209–13. 03–97Boulton, Alex (Centre de Téléenseignement, Université Nancy 2, France). Aspects lexicaux de l'acquisition ‘naturelle’ et l'apprentissage ‘artificiel’ en L2. [Lexical aspects of ‘natural’ acquisition and ‘artificial’ learning in a second language.] Mélanges CRAPEL (Nancy, France), 26 (2001), 63–90. 03–98Bruton, A. (Universidad de Sevilla, Spain; Email: abruton@siff.us.es ). Recoding and reorganising grammatical form by meaning: The English genitive as an example. System (Oxford, UK), 30, 2 (2002), 237–50. 03–99Bybee, Joan (U. of New Mexico, USA; Email: jbybee@unm.edu ). Phonological evidence for exemplar storage of multiword sequences. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (New York, USA), 24, 2 (2002), 215–21. 03–100Carson, Joan C. (Georgia State U., USA; Email: jgcarson@gsu.edu ) and Longhini, Ana. Focusing on learning styles and strategies: A diary study in an immersion setting. Language Learning (Malden, MA, USA), 52, 2 (2002), 401–38. 03–101Cenoz, Jasone (U. of the Basque Country). Age differences in foreign language learning. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics (Leuven, Belgium), 135–136 (2002), 125–42. 03–102Chung, Hyun-Sook (Internat. Graduate School of English, Korea; Email: sook@igse.ac.kr ) and Ahn, Hyunkee. Local acoustic vs. sentence contextual information: Which plays a more crucial role in an L2 word recognition test?English Teaching (Korea), 57, 3 (2002), 239–51. 03–103Chung, Jing-mei (Ming-Hsin Inst. of Technology, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan). The effects of using two advance organizers with video texts for the teaching of listening in English. Foreign Language Annals (New York, USA), 35, 2 (2002), 231–41. 03–104Cortés, Kristin Hull (U. of California, Berkeley, USA). Youth and the study of foreign language: An investigation of attitudes. Foreign Language Annals (New York, USA), 35, 3 (2002), 320–32. 03–105D'Angiulli, Amedeo and Siegel, Linda S. (U. of British Columbia, Canada; Email: linda.siegel@ubc.ca ) and Serra, Emily. The development of reading, in English and Italian bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics (Cambridge, UK), 22, 4 (2001), 479–507. 03–106Derwing, Tracey M. and Rossiter, Marian J. (U. of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Email: tracey.derwing@ualberta.ca ). ESL learners' perceptions of their pronunciation needs and strategies. System (Oxford, UK), 30, 2 (2002), 155–66. 03–107Dewaele, Jean-Marc (Birkbeck Coll., U. of London, UK; Email: j.dewaele@bbk.ac.uk ), and Pavlenko, Aneta. Emotion vocabulary in interlanguage. Language Learning (Malden, MA, USA), 52, 2 (2002), 263–322. 03–108Ellis, Nick C. (U. of Wales, Bangor, UK; Email: n.ellis@bangor.ac.uk ). Frequency effects of language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (New York, USA), 24, 2 (2002), 143–88. 03–109Ellis, Nick C. (U. of Wales, Bangor, UK; Email: n.ellis@bangor.ac.uk ). Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (New York, USA), 24, 2 (2002), 297–39. 03–110Ellis, Rod (U. of Auckland, New Zealand; Email: r.ellis@auckland.ac.nz ). Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A review of the research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (New York, USA), 24, 2 (2002), 223–36. 03–111Eubank, Lynn (U. of North Texas, USA; Email: lynneubank@yahoo.com ) and Gregg, Kevin R. News flash – Hume still dead. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (New York, USA), 24, 2 (2002), 237–47. 03–112Fries-Verdeil, Marie-Hélène and Hay, Josiane (Université de Grenoble I, France). De l'utilité des métaphores comme outil pour la Recherche-Action: le cas de l'auto-formation guidée. [Metaphors as a tool for Action Research and self-directed language learning.] Les Cahiers de l'APLIUT (Grenoble, France), 21, 3 (2001) 45–58. 03–113Frost, Dan (IUT 2 Grenoble, France). Seeing is believing: l

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.909

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2720.194

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLanguage TeachingSame topicEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningFrench-language works237,207