Resistance and Revolution: Craft Beer Versus Corporate Giants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
THE PREVIOUS CHAPTER ended with the early modern period, and this chapter leaps into the 1980s. There is, of course, a wealth of sociohistorical information about the centuries in between; the full story of craft beer does not begin with the American legalization of homebrewing in 1978. It was not until the 1980s, however, that the industry began to develop into the form in which we see it today, in both Canada and the United States. This chapter provides the important corporate context for the rapid growth of craft brewing in North America and considers how the political and social ideologies of craft beer were largely shaped by resistance and dissent while simultaneously— and unconsciously— becoming complicit with those same points of resistance. Beer Production in North America: Corporate Giants and the “Little Guys” The craft-brewing industry in North America is both a response to and a result of the growth of corporations. One cannot explore the craft beer industry without also understanding the rise of powerful North American corporate brewers, those whose names are widely recognized even by non-drinkers— companies such as Budweiser, Miller, Coors, Molson, and Labatt. These beer giants hold a monopoly on the industry but also offer an ideologically useful contrast to the growing population of craft brewers seen by themselves and others as the “authentic little guys.” In summarizing the pattern of craft and corporate growth over the past several decades, I hope to provide some important economic context for the sociocultural impact of craft beer and the use of history in its marketing. While beer has a storied history from the early modern period until the early twentieth century, my focus is predominantly on what happened in Canadian and American brewing from the late 1970s until today. During these past forty years, craft brewing has become not only an increasingly influential economic player, but a cultural symbol of taste, ingenuity, freedom, and (comprising all these things) masculinity. The temperance movement and the years of Prohibition (1920– 1933 in the United States, 1919– 1920 in Canada) dealt a hard blow to small-scale brewers. When US Prohibition ended in 1933, the only brewers that could survive were those that were already large— companies such as Pabst and Coors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".