MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231874283 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckt188

Parallel Session 4: Friday 15 November, 13:30-15:00

2013· article· en· W4231874283 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealthcare Facilities Design and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSession (web analytics)MedicineComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This workshop will present and discuss future societal needs by identifying links between environmental, social, health and economic factors.It will discuss the principles of sustainable development and in particular how it links with public health and wellbeing for all.We have to change our lifestyles quite drastically in order to remain within the planetary limits of our natural resources.How can we do that?How can we make our lifestyles more sustainable and healthy at the same time and create opportunities for everyone?This workshop will identify enablers and barriers for more sustainable societies such as related to policy and governance, the economy, environment, to social and technological innovation, behaviour change and wider social determinants of health equity.The workshop will demonstrate that there are positive trends and solutions possible, for example linking health and nature, but new research is needed to capture these innovations and to investigate how they can be scaled up or mainstreamed.Public Health researchers, professionals and decision makers should work more closely together with sustainable development stakeholders and other disciplines and include health equity impact assessments.The workshop will present the plans of EuroHealthNet for a new European Centre for Innovation, Research and implementation for Health and Wellbeing that aims to look ahead and anticipate how societies might develop in the future.A discussion will be facilitated on what research is needed to inform policy to respond to new trends such as demographic change, urbanisation, climate change and the environment, economic issues, technological and social innovation, in anticipation of the new Horizon 2020 programme. Key messageThe purpose of this workshop is to learn about new challenges related to environmental, social and economic factors, to discuss the role of public health research and how it can contribute to inform policy making for sustainable societies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6890.520

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicHealthcare Facilities Design and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207