Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gaspara Stampa (b. c. 1523–d. 1554) was born in Padua to Bartolomeo, a wealthy jewel merchant, and his wife, Cecilia. From an early age Gaspara, her sister, Cassandra, and her brother, Baldassarre, received an extensive education. When Gaspara’s father died, her mother moved the entire family to Venice. By the mid-1540s both Gaspara and Cassandra were renowned for their skill in music, and their household had become a famous musical and literary salon. Stampa’s verse was composed for such performances. In the late 1540s she met the person who would become the principal subject of her poems, Count Collaltino di Collalto, the member of a prestigious family of feudal lords from Treviso. Stampa’s love affair with Collaltino—complicated by the difference in their social status and by Collaltino’s frequent absences for military campaigns or visits to his feudal estates—lasted for several years. A different love interest, Bartolomeo Zen, the subject of a dozen of Stampa’s love poems, seems to have taken Collaltino’s place after that relationship ended. Stampa’s unconventionality in replacing one love interest with another, as well as her openness in describing her relationships and her desires, prompted a scholar in the early 20th century, Abdelkader Salza, to advance the hypothesis that she may have been a courtesan, and the question still remains unsolved. Similarly unclear is the way in which Stampa performed her own verse and that of other poets, such as Petrarch (b. 1304–d. 1374). What is known is that, despite her fame as a virtuosa in Venice, Stampa’s verse was not disseminated in print during her lifetime. When Gaspara Stampa died in 1554, only three of her poems had been published, and the first collected edition of her poems, Rime di Madonna Gaspara Stampa, was published posthumously in 1554 thanks to the efforts of her sister, Cassandra.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.104 | 0.033 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".