MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231909280 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/egzs8

Modelaje Geoquímico de la Manifestación Volcanico-Exhalativa Submarina “Los Tramojos” en el Complejo Vulcanógeno Sedimentario de Cuba Central.

2019· preprint· en· W4231909280 on OpenAlexaff
Ricardo A. Valls

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsSystems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyBrecciaGeochemistryBornitePyriteOutcropSphaleriteVolcanoStockworkFelsicChalcopyriteVolcanogenic massive sulfide ore depositVolcanic rockPyroclastic rockVolcanic beltMineralogyCopperChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We studied an outcrop of massive iron-copper-zinc sulphides in Cretaceous volcanogenic intermediate to felsic rocks, located to the south of the village Los Tramojos, in the province of Sancti Spiritus, in Central Cuba. It is an artificial cut of dacitic tuffs and volcanic breccias with a strong mineralized area, dark in color, containing pyrite, magnetite, barite, sphalerite, bornite and others copper sulphides, as well as apatite, galenita and chalcopyrite. This area includes another tectonic zone with limonitic, hematitic, zeolitic and chloritic alterations, in contact with tuffs and non-mineralized and fresh volcanic breccias. It is a manifestation of a submarine volcanic-exhalative type. The mineralized area described above are very like the so call "Black Ores" of the Kuroko type of deposits. We investigated an area of 3,000 m2 using a soil grid of 25 x 10 meters, with some lithogeochemical samples. This study allowed to determine the correlation coefficients characteristic of the ore zone. We recommend the use of these correlation coefficients, combined with geophysical and perforation work, to check ore potential of the Sector "Los Tramojos".

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Tectonic Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207