MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231913675 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbx022.001

M2. Kynurenic Acid in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2017· review· en· W4231913675 on OpenAlexaff
Eric Plitman, Fernando Caravaggio, Yusuke Iwata, Shinichiro Nakajima, Jun Ku Chung, Philip Gerretsen, Julia Kim, Hiroyoshi Takeuchi, M. Mallar Chakravarty, Gary Remington, Ariel Graff‐Guerrero

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University InstituteUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKynurenic acidKynurenineSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Meta-analysisSubgroup analysisMedicinePsychosisPsycINFOStrictly standardized mean differenceInternal medicineNeurosciencePsychologyMEDLINEPsychiatryGlutamate receptorTryptophanChemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Kynurenic acid (KYNA) is an endogenous antagonist of N-methyl-D-aspartate and α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors that is derived from astrocytes as part of the kynurenine pathway of tryptophan degradation. Mounting evidence suggests that abnormal KYNA levels are involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia (SCZ). Although individual studies have shown deviations in KYNA levels in patients with SCZ, their findings have not been assessed through a meta-analysis. The primary purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the difference in KYNA levels between patients with SCZ and healthy controls (HCs). Methods: A literature search was conducted through Ovid using Embase, Medline, and PsycINFO databases (last search: January 2016) with the search terms: (kynuren* or KYNA) and (schizophreni* or psychosis). English language studies investigating KYNA levels in patients with SCZ and in HCs were identified. The difference in KYNA levels between patients with SCZ and HCs was determined by calculating standardized mean differences. Subgroup analyses were separately performed for KYNA measurement technique and KYNA sample source. Results: The search yielded 295 publications and 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the main analysis, KYNA levels were elevated in patients with SCZ compared to HCs. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that KYNA levels were increased in the patient group within cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissue samples, and centrally but not peripherally. Conclusion: Taken together, KYNA levels are increased in patients with SCZ, although elevations appear to be localized to the central nervous system. To better wholly assess findings from heterogeneous study designs, future investigations should focus on elucidating the relationships among KYNA levels within cerebrospinal fluid, brain tissue, plasma, and saliva in patients with SCZ. Overall, an improved understanding of KYNA in patients with SCZ may contribute to the development of novel diagnostic approaches and therapeutic strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.006
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia BulletinSame topicTryptophan and brain disordersFrench-language works237,207