Book Reviews
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peter Balla, The Child-Parent Relationship in the New Testament and Its Environment, reviewed by Allison A. Trites John J. Collins, The Bible after Babel: Historical Criticism in a PostmodernAge, reviewed by David J. Hawkin Charles H. Cosgrove, Herold Weiss, K.K. (Khiok-Khng) Yeo, Cross-Cultural Paul: Journeys to Others, Journey to Ourselves, reviewed by Steve D. Black Philip F. Esler, Conflict and Identity in Romans: The Social Setting of Paul s Letter, reviewed by Kenneth A.Fox Craig A. Evans, Ancient Texts for New Testament Studies: A Guide to the Background Literature, reviewed by Ryan D. Wettlaufer Alan David Crown and Reinhard Pummer, A Bibliography of the Samaritans: Third Edition Revised, Expanded and Annotated, reviewed by Ryan D. Wettlaufer Jeffrey P. Greenman, Timothy Larsen, eds., Reading Romans through the Centuries: From the Early Church to KarlBarth, reviewed by Allison A. Trites Bruce J. Malina and John J. Pilch, Social-Science Commentary on the Letters of Paul, reviewed by Matthew W Mitchell J. Richard Middleton, The Liberating Image: The Imago Dei in Genesis 1, reviewed by Brian P. Irwin Cristian Badilita and Charles Kannengiesser, eds., Les Pères de l'Église dans Ie monde d'aujourd'hui, reviewed by Shawn W.J. Keough Jonathan Edmondson, Steve Mason and James Rives, eds., Flavius Josephus and Flavian Rome, reviewed by Paul Spilsbury Thomas Albert Howard, Protestant Theology and the Making of the Modern German University, reviewed by Donald Wiebe Clayton N. Jefford, The Apostolic Fathers and the New Testament, reviewed by Shawn W.J. Keough Paul Trebilco, The Early Christians in Ephesus from Paul to Ignatius, reviewed by Stephen L. Chambers Leif E. Vaage, ed., Religious Rivalries in the Early Roman Empire and the Rise o/Christianity, reviewed by Gerbern S. Oegema Augustine Meier, Thomas St. James O'Connor, Peter L. Van Katwyk, eds., Spirituality and Health: Multidisciplinary Explorations, reviewed by Marilyn-Ann Elphick David Self, Struggling with Forgiveness, reviewed by Marilyn-Ann Elphick EndNote X., reviewed by Brian P. Irwin Stephen Edmondson, Calvin's Christology, reviewed by Scott N. Kindred-Barnes Jeannine Hill Fletcher, Monopoly on Salvation? A Feminist Approach to Religious Pluralism, reviewed by Dorcas Gordon Dwight N. Hopkins, Being Human: Race, Culture, and Religion, reviewed by Robin Koning Marshall McLuhan, The Classical Trivium: The Place of Thomas Nashe in the Learning of his Time, reviewed by Nadia Delicata Neil Ormerod, The Trinity: Retrieving the Western Tradition, reviewed by Gordon A. Rixon Arvind Sharma, Religious Studies and Comparative Method: The Case for Reciprocal Illumination, reviewed by John F. Duggan Miroslav Volf and Michael Welker, eds., God's Life in Trinity, reviewed by Don Schweitzer
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.470 | 0.490 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".