Book Reviews
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Culture of Curating and the Curating of Culture(S), Paul O’Neill Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (2012), 192 pp., Hardcover, ISBN: 978-0-262-01772-5, US$24.95 Cultures of the Curatorial, Beatrice Von Bismarck, Jörn Schafaff and Thomas Weski (eds) Leipzig: Sternberg Press and Kulturen des Kuratorischen an der Hochschule für Grafik und Buchkunst/Academy of Visual Arts Leipzig (2012), 376 pp., Paperback, ISBN: 978-1-934105-97-9, €19.00 Performing the Curatorial: Within and Beyond Art, Maria Lind (ed.) Berlin: Sternberg Press, Tensta konsthall, ArtMonitor/University of Gothenburg (2012), 162 pp., Paperback, ISBN: 978-1-934105-89-4, €19.00 Curating in the Caribbean, David A. Bailey, Alissandra Cummins, Axel Lapp and Allison Thompson (eds) Berlin: the Green Box (2012), 184 pp., Paperback, ISBN: 978-3-941644-32-8, €15.00 Film, Art, New Media: Museum Without Walls?, Angela Dalle Vacche (ed.) London: Palgrave Macmillan (2012), 336 pp., Hardcover, ISBN: 978-0-230-27292-7, £60.00 Artists’ Magazines: An Alternative Space for Art, Gwen Allen Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (2011), 368 pp., Hardcover, ISBN: 978-0-262015-19-6, US$37.95
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it