Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The slide of granular material in nature and engineering can happen under air (subaerial), under a liquidlike water (submerged), or a transition between these two regimes, where a subaerial slide enters a liquid and becomes submerged. Here, we experimentally investigate these three slide regimes (i.e., subaerial, submerged, and transitional) in two dimensions, for various slope angles, material types, and bed roughness. The goal is to shed light on the complex morphodynamics and flow structure of these granular flows and also to provide comprehensive benchmarks for the validation and parametrization of the numerical models. The slide regime is found to be a major controller of the granular morphodynamics (e.g., shape evolution and internal flow structure). The time history of the runout distance for the subaerial and submerged cases present a similar three-phase trend (with acceleration, steady flow, and deceleration phases) tough with different spatiotemporal scales. Compared to the subaerial cases, the submerged cases show longer runout time and shorter final runout distances. The transitional trends, however, show additional deceleration and reacceleration. The observations suggest that the impact of slide angle, material type, and bed roughness on the morphodynamics is less significant where the material interacts with water. Flow structure, extracted using a granular particle image velocimetry technique, shows a relatively power-law velocity profile for the subaerial condition and strong circulations for the submerged condition. An unsteady theoretical model based on the µ(I) rheology is developed and is shown to be effective in the prediction of the average velocity of the granular mass.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.054 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it