MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232227875 · doi:10.14740/jem337w

Clinical and Genetic Study of Pseudohypoparathyroidism Type 1b in Hong Kong Chinese

2016· article· en· W4232227875 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ho‐Ming Luk

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Endocrinology and Metabolism · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGNAS complex locusPseudohypoparathyroidismMedicineImprinting (psychology)Uniparental disomyMultiplex ligation-dependent probe amplificationGeneticsChinese populationLocus (genetics)GeneBioinformaticsChromosomeParathyroid hormoneInternal medicineKaryotypeBiologyGenotypeExon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1b (PHP-1b) is a rare congenital imprinting disease characterized by parathyroid hormone resistance, normal neurodevelopment and no feature of Albright hereditary osteodystrophy. It is caused by genetic and epigenetic defect of GNAS locus located at chromosome 20q13.32 region. We here have reported a case series of three cases of PHP-1b in Hong Kong Chinese. Two were sporadic and one was autosomal dominant (AD) subtype. All of them were identified by methylation specific-multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification method. The AD PHP-1b case had typical 3-kb STX16 gene deletion. There was no paternal uniparental disomy chromosome 20 for those sporadic cases. Although PHP-1b had been well studied in western population, it is rarely reported in Chinese. This study is the first comprehensive study of PHP-1b for Hong Kong Chinese in the literature. With more awareness and better understanding of PHP-1b, it will result in judicious use of genetic testing and better medical management of this orphan disease. J Endocrinol Metab. 2016;6(2):64-70 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jem337w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Endocrinology and MetabolismSame topicGenetic Syndromes and ImprintingFrench-language works237,207