Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cisplatin is a commonly prescribed chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of different types of solid tumors. However, the high incidence of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity largely restricts its clinical efficacy in absence of both preventive and treatment options to combat its serious and life-threatening effects. Therefore, the current study investigated the reno-protective molecular mechanisms of vincamine against cisplatin nephrotoxicity. Vincamine (40 mg/kg P.O.) was given for 7 days, cisplatin was injected as single dose (10 mg/kg i.p.) at the seven day of the experiments. Animals were sacrificed after 72 h of cisplatin injection to allow nephrotoxicity. Vincamine pretreatment improved kidney functions and decreased kidney function tests as urea, creatinine and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), as well as it exhibited antioxidant properties by restoring balance between pro and anti-oxidants of malondialdehyde (MDA), myeloperoxidase (MPO), nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and hemeoxygenase-1 (HO-1). Moreover, vincamine hindered the inflammatory cascade via mediating Toll like receptor 4 (TLR4)- interferon gamma (IFNγ)-CD44 cells pathway and transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ1). Additionally, vincamine retained DNA fragmentation. In conclusion, vincamine represents a promising intervention in limiting cisplatin nephrotoxicity by its anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, antiapoptotic mechanistic activities. Therefore, vincamine can be used as adjunct therapy with cisplatin to mitigate cisplatin-induced-AKI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".