MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4232343074 · doi:10.24124/2019/58964

Spiropyrrolizidine and piperazine derivatives: Synthesis and evaluation on kras expression levels in human colon cancer cells

2019· dissertation· en· W4232343074 on OpenAlexaff
Victor Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKRASColorectal cancerFlow cytometryIC50ChemistryMTT assayCancer researchMessenger RNACell cycleIn vitroMolecular biologyPharmacologyCancerCellBiologyBiochemistryGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KRAS-driven cancers are notoriously difficult to treat due to poor pharmacodynamics of downstream inhibitors and resistance to anti-EGFR drugs. IMP-1 is a post-transcriptional regulator of KRAS mRNA. As a novel therapeutic approach, the targeting of the IMP-1-KRAS mRNA complex with a spiropyrrolizidine derivative (UNBC152), was studied. LC-MS analysis of UNBC152 indicated presence of impurities. The purpose of this study was to synthesize UNBC152 and determine the responsible bioactive molecule within the impurities. LC-MS and TLC suggested the presence of a bioactive [3+3] cycloaddition side product (SPOPP) in UNBC152. SPOPP suppressed KRAS expression in human colorectal cancer cells. Fluorescence polarization determined that SPOPP did not impact the IMP-1-KRAS mRNA interaction. SPOPP induced G2/M cell cycle arrest as shown by flow cytometry. MTT assay confirmed the SPOPP-induced growth inhibition in SW480 (IC50 = 4.17 μM) and HT29 (IC50 = 6.76 μM). These findings represent a first reporting on the bioactivity of SPOPP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways→French-language works237,207→