MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232398210 · doi:10.22587/ajbas.2018.12.8.9

Nitrogen Enrichment of Activated Carbon Made From Coconut Shell of Ivory Coast and its Application in Cd2+ Ions Removal

2018· article· en· W4232398210 on OpenAlexaff
Vianet Kouakou, Tchirioua Ekou, Lynda Ekou, Trong‐On Do

Bibliographic record

VenueAUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCES · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActivated carbonNitrogenShell (structure)Carbon fibersIonChemistryCote d ivoirePulp and paper industryEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental chemistryMaterials scienceAdsorptionOrganic chemistryArtHumanitiesComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urea was employed to modify activated carbons by KOH activation at high temperature from coconut shell from Ivory Coast.The urea-modified activated carbon was used to improve Cd2+ ions adsorption from aqueous solutions.The original activated carbon (AC) and urea-modified activated carbon (ACU) were characterized by N2 adsorption/desorption, Boehm's titration, SEM, FTIR,elemental analysis and XPS analysis.The Cd2+ ions removal capabilities of AC and ACU were evaluated by batch sorption experiments.The results of N2 adsorption/desorption demonstrated that the BET surface areas and total pore volumes of AC decreased after urea-modification.Nevertheless, the results of elemental analysis, Boehm's titration and FTIR showed that ACU contained more surface nitrogen functional groups than AC.Adsorption tests revealed that ACU had a higher adsorption capacity of Cd2+ than AC.Experimental adsorption data of Cd2+ ions on AC and ACU were better described by the Freundlich model.The main mechanisms for the adsorption of Cd2+ ions onto the carbons were supposed to be cation exchange and covalent bond formation.Kinetic study was performed,and the pseudo-second order model better described the adsorptions processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCESSame topicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalFrench-language works237,207