Clinical Studies of Reshaped Integrated Dual Balloon System in Obese Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Obesity is an abnormal accumulation of body fat usually 20% or more over an individual's ideal body weight; obesity is associated with increased risk of illness, disability and death.For individuals seeking to improve their health the weight loss journey may provide two few options in the gap between diet and exercise and bariatric surgery.Now by the end of July 2015 United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) approved a new intra gastric balloon system for the treatment of obesity i.e Re-Shaped Integrated Dual Balloon System.In this article we are going to discuss the clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of intra gastric balloons.The Re-Shape Integrated Dual Balloon has been marketed in Europe under a ConformiteEuropéene (CE) mark received in 2007.A CE mark was obtained for the Re-Shape Removal Catheter in 2010.The Re-Shape Integrated Dual Balloon, Re-Shape Delivery Catheter, and Re-Shape Removal Catheter were approved by Health Canada in 2010.The Re-Shape Integrated Dual Balloon has not been withdrawn from marketing for any reason related to its safety or effectiveness.Re-shape has already released impressive postmarketing data, which it attributes largely to the unusual motivation and dedication of the patients and healthcare proveders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".