Life cycles and population dynamics of enchytraeids (Oligochaeta) from the High Arctic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the results of the first study of the population dynamics and life cycles of Arctic enchytraeid populations. Sampling was undertaken in a Salix heath in Adventdalen, Svalbard, during one summer and the succeeding spring. In addition, a Cassiope heath at a more northerly site close to Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard, was sampled twice. The Arctic enchytraeids were generally smaller at maturity than their temperate-zone relatives. The three most numerous species in the Salix heath, Henlea perpusilla, Henlea glandulifera, and Bryodrilus parvus, hatched from cocoons in early summer and attained adult size early in their second summer. A few H. perpusilla and H. glandulifera reached mature size in their first summer; since the summer of investigation was unusually cold, these species may have a 1-year life cycle in warmer years. Life cycles were apparently longer in the Cassiope heath than in the Salix heath. Henlea perpusilla, H. glandulifera, and B. parvus produced eggs throughout the summer in the Salix heath, though hatching was restricted to early summer. Therefore, the hypothesis that cocoons require a cold period to hatch was tested in a laboratory experiment. When soil containing cocoons was incubated at -5°C for 3 weeks, a significant increase in juveniles was demonstrated for H. perpusilla and Bryodrilus diverticulatus compared with soils kept at constant summer temperatures. This is the first time that breaking of dormancy by an external stimulus has been demonstrated in enchytraeid cocoons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".