Reuse of Single-use Critical Medical Devices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reprints are available for purchase from SGNA Headquarters. To order, contact: Department of Membership Services, Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates, Inc., 330 North Wabash, Chicago, IL 60611 (e-mail: [email protected]) THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSES AND ASSOCIATES, INC. AND THE CANADIAN SOCIETY OF GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSES AND ASSOCIATES DEDICATED TO THE SAFE AND EFFECTIVE PRACTICE OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND ENDOSCOPY NURSING DISCLAIMER The Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates, Inc. (SGNA), presents this guideline for use in developing institutional policies, procedures, and/or protocols. Information contained in this guideline is based on current published data and current practice at the time of publication. The Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates, Inc., assumes no responsibility for the practices or recommendations of any member or other practitioner, or for the policies and practices of any practice setting. Nurses and associates function within the limits of state licensure, state nurse practice act, and/or institutional policy. The members of the SGNA Practice Committee 2011-2012 are Michelle E. Day, MSN, BSN, RN, CGRN, Chair; Michelle Juan, MSN, RN, CGRN, Co-Chair; Kathy Buffington, BSN, RN, CGRN; Rhonda L. Casey, RN, BS, MHA, CGRN; Cynthia M. Friis, MEd, BSN, RN-BC; Ann Herrin, BSN, RN, CGRN; Colleen Kelley Keith, MSN, RN, CGRN; Judy Lindsay, MA, BSN, RN, CGRN; Marilee Schmelzer, PhD, RN; and Barbara Zuccala, MSN, RN, CGRN. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.052 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.756 | 0.723 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".