Independent comment on Audio‐visual and Print Materials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Book reviewed in this article: Sheila's Book: A Shared Journey Through Madness Sheila Harvey (Ed.) Taunton, Somerset, Somerset Virtual College NHS Publications Case Book for Integrating Family Therapy: An Ecosystemic Approach S. H. McDaniel, D. Lusterman and C. Philpot Treating Difficult Couples: Helping Clients with Coexisting Mental and Relationship Disorders. Douglas K. Snyder & Mark A. Whisman (Eds) Art Therapy Practice: Innovative Approaches with Diverse Populations. Harriet Wadeson Nurses and Families: A Guide to Family Assessment and Intervention, 3rd edn. Lorraine M. Wright & Maureen Leahey Family Nursing Interviewing Skills: How to Engage, Assess, Intervene and Terminate with Families. Lorraine M. Wright & Maureen Leahey Calgary Family Assessment Model: How to Apply in Clinical Practice Systems and Meaning: Consulting in Organisations. Gitte Haslebo and Kit Sanne Nielsen, transl. by Dorte Herholdt Silver Pioneering Paths in the Study of Families: The Lives and Careers of Family Scholars. Suzanne K. Steinmetz and Gary W. Peterson (Eds) Emotions and the Family. Richard A. Fabes (Ed.)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".