Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2015), "List of Contributors", Cognition and Strategy (Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 32), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. ix-x. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220150000032028 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2015 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Jamie Anderson Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, UK Pino G. Audia Dartmouth College, USA Mark Bergen University of Minnesota, USA Anne Bowers University of Toronto, Canada Sebastien Brion IESE Business School, Spain Stefano Brusoni ETH Zurich, Switzerland Stefano Cappa IUSS Pavia and San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan Andy Dong University of Sydney, Australia Fabio Fonti ESC Rennes School of Business, France Nicolai J. Foss Copenhagen Business School, Denmark; Norwegian School of Economics, Norway Massimo Garbuio University of Sydney, Australia Mary Ann Glynn Boston College, USA Henrich R. Greve INSEAD, France Martine R. Haas University of Pennsylvania, USA Wendy Ham University of Pennsylvania, USA Mariano Heyden Newcastle Business School, UK Gerard P. Hodgkinson Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, UK John Joseph University of California, Irvine, USA Steven J. Kahl Dartmouth College, USA Sarah Kaplan University of Toronto, Canada Daniella Laureiro Martinez ETH Zurich and School of Management, Universidad de los Andes, Switzerland Eucman Lee London Business School, UK Stefan Linder ESSEC Business School, France Dan Lovallo University of Sydney, Australia Massimo Maoret IESE Business School, Spain Anoop Menon University of Pennsylvania, USA Pierre-Xavier Meschi IAE Aix-en-Provence, Aix-Marseille Université, CERGAM & SKEMA Business School, France Emmanuel Métais EDHEC Business School, France C. Chet Miller University of Houston, USA Joseph Porac New York University, USA Phanish Puranam INSEAD, Singapore Jens Schmidt Aalto University, Finland Diego Stea Copenhagen Business School, Denmark Christian Tröster Kuhne Logistics University, Germany Sebastiaan Van Doorn Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, UK Vinod Venkatraman Temple University, USA Henk Volberda Rotterdam School of Management, The Netherlands Robert Whitbred Cleveland State University, USA Alex James Wilson Duke University, USA Robert P. Wright The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong Tieying Yu Boston College, USA Mark J. Zbaracki Ivey Business School, Western University, Canada Maurizio Zollo Università Bocconi, Italy Book Chapters Cognition and Strategy Advances in Strategic Management Cognition and Strategy Copyright Page List of Contributors Introduction Truce Breaking and Remaking: The CEO’s Role in Changing Organizational Routines Microfoundations of Knowledge Recombination: Peripheral Knowledge and Breakthrough Innovation in Teams Self-Assessment, Self-Enhancement, and the Choice of Comparison Organizations for Evaluating Organizational Performance Product Conceptual Systems: Toward a Cognitive Processing Model Cognitive Categorization and Network Perception: Cognitive Aggregated Social Structures in Opaque Networks The Nature of Expertise in Organization Design: Evidence from an Expert–Novice Comparison Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance: Investigating Local Requirements for Entrepreneurial Decision-Making Category Expectations, Category Spanning, and Market Outcomes Understanding Organizational Advantage: How the Theory of Mind Adds to the Attention-Based View of the Firm Competitive Memory: Bringing the Strategic Past into the Present Managerial Overoptimism in Strategy Formulation: An Associative Explanation Cognitive Neurosciences and Strategic Management: Challenges and Opportunities in Tying the Knot Managing Market Attention Organizational Attention and Technological Search in the Multibusiness Firm: Motorola from 1974 to 1997 A Design Cognition Perspective on Strategic Option Generation Leader Longevity, Cognitive Inertia, and Performance in Organizations with Stretch Goals: Evidence from “La Royale” and its Ambition to Gain Naval Supremacy Between 1689 and 1783 Emotionalizing Strategy Research with the Repertory Grid Technique: Modifications and Extensions to a Robust Procedure for Mapping Strategic Knowledge Cognition, Resources, and Opportunities: Managerial Judgment, Theories of Success and the Origin of Novel Strategies
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.726 | 0.735 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".