MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232568195 · doi:10.1186/s40814-016-0078-7

Erratum to: Methods and processes for development of a CONSORT extension for reporting pilot randomized controlled trials

2016· erratum· en· W4232568195 on OpenAlexaff
Lehana Thabane, Sally Hopewell, Gillian Lancaster, Christine Bond, Claire Coleman, Michael J. Campbell, Sandra Eldridge

Bibliographic record

VenuePilot and Feasibility Studies · 2016
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicMeta-analysis and systematic reviews
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsolidated Standards of Reporting TrialsExtension (predicate logic)Randomized controlled trialPsychologyComputer scienceMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s40814-016-0065-z.].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.651
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.930
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.6510.930
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0500.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.913
GPT teacher head0.651
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePilot and Feasibility StudiesSame topicMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsFrench-language works237,207