Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Citation (2013), "List of Contributors", Advances in Group Processes (Advances in Group Processes, Vol. 30), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. vii-viii. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0882-6145(2013)0000030002 Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited Copyright © 2013 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Joseph Berger Department of Sociology, Stanford University, CA, USA Joseph Dippong Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina-Charlotte, NC, USA M. Hamit Fişek Department of Psychology, Boğaziçi University, Turkey Martha Foschi Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, BC, Canada Carla Goar Department of Sociology, Kent State University, OH, USA Matthew O. Hunt Department of Sociology, Northeastern University, MA, USA Pamela Braboy Jackson Department of Sociology, Indiana University, IN, USA Samuel H. Kye Department of Sociology, Indiana University, IN, USA Kathryn J. Lively Department of Sociology, Dartmouth College, NH, USA Bianca Manago Department of Sociology, Texas A&M, TX, USA David Melamed Department of Sociology, University of South Carolina, SC, USA Calixto Melero Department of Sociology, Texas A&M, TX, USA David Peterson Department of Sociology, Northwestern University, IL, USA Brian Powell Department of Sociology, Indiana University, IN, USA Bobbi Reidinger Department of Sociology, Kent State University, OH, USA Christabel L. Rogalin Department of Social Sciences, Purdue University, North Central, IN, USA Scott V. Savage Department of Sociology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA Jane Sell Department of Sociology, Texas A&M, TX, USA Lala Carr Steelman Department of Sociology, University of South Carolina, SC, USA Arnout van de Rijt Department of Sociology and the Institute for Advanced Computational Science, Stony Brook University, NY, USA Aaron Vincent Department of Sociology, University of South Carolina, SC, USA Morris Zelditch Department of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Book Chapters Advances in Group Processes: Thirtieth Anniversary Edition Advances in Group Processes Advances in Group Processes: Thirtieth Anniversary Edition Copyright Page List of Contributors Preface Thirty Years of Advances in Group Processes: A Review Essay Still Color-Blind? The Treatment of Race, Ethnicity, Intersectionality, and Sexuality in Sociological Social Psychology ☆ Note: Authors’ contributions are equal. Race and Ethnic Composition of Groups: Experimental Investigations The Spread of Status Value: A Theoretical Extension The Role of Uncertainty in Social Influence ☆ Portions of this paper were presented at the 2013 Annual Meeting of the Southern Sociological Society. The Professional Credentials of Immigrants: A Status-and-Expectations Approach Selection and Influence in the Assimilation Process of Immigrants Using Simulated Interactions to Explore Emotional Processes and Status Organizing Processes: A Joint Application of Expectation States Theory and Affect Control Theory Age and the Experience and Management of Emotion A Generalized Theory of Conflicting Leader Identity on Group Performance The Ivy and the Trellis: Agency, Biology, and Socialization
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it