9. Multiple Perspectives: An Orientation Resource for Queen’s Project on International Development Interns Working in Arviat (ᐊᕐᕕᐊᑦ), Nunavut with the Summer Camp Program
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2011-2012 I was the Site Director for Queen’s Project on International Development’s (QPID) summer development project in Arviat, Nunavut. The project involves QPID Interns and the Site Director assisting the Arviat community in the coordination of their summer camp program. During my time in Arviat, I collected data from a variety of sources to inform the creation of an orientation resource for future Queen’s students working with the summer camp program. I used a blog to document my observations, interactions with the community, daily activities at camp, and the progression of my adjustment and adaptation to my experiences both in the job and in the community. Interns Katie Joyce and Holly Smith contributed information about their thoughts and observations of the community and the camp program. Also, Shirley Tagalik and Wendy Savikataaq, both community members, contributed information on Arviat’s history and culture. Three objectives of this resource include: 1) to develop an encompassing orientation resource for QPID Interns consisting of guiding information on all aspects of the project using a variety of perspectives; 2) to provide consistency and sustainability for QPID’s involvement through creating knowledge documentation of the project; and 3) to develop and encourage cross cultural knowledge sharing between Arviat and Kingston. As a tool for knowledge sharing that provides guidance and encourages a growing understanding of the Arviat community, this resource will be given to QPID electronically so that it can be built upon and refined over time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".