Response of phytoplankton communities to liquid creosote in freshwater microcosms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We assessed the response of phytoplankton communities in aquatic microcosms to single applications of liquid creosote. The creosote was applied to 14 microcosms at concentrations ranging from 0.06 to 109 mg/L. Two microcosms served as controls. Phytoplankton samples were collected from each microcosm one week and 1 d before treatment and at 7 and 21 d after treatment. Temporal changes (response–recovery) in phytoplankton community composition were assessed with principal response curves. Creosote had no direct toxic effect on the phytoplankton community based on total abundance and number of taxa. Population levels declined in all treatments between day −1 and day 7, but this trend mirrored a similar decline in the control microcosms. At both 7 and 21 d after treatment, population densities and number of taxa in most treatments exceeded those in the controls and exhibited a parabolic relationship relative to creosote concentration. This relationship was most pronounced at 21 d, at which time population densities and number of taxa at intermediate concentrations were up to twice those at low and high concentrations. This response pattern seems to represent an indirect response to impacts on zooplankton and a corresponding reduction in grazing pressure. In contrast, total algal biomass declined 52 to 97% relative to the controls at all but the lowest creosote concentration at 7 d. This apparent decline was due to a significant proliferation of the alga Closterium moniliforme in the controls and low creosote concentration. At 21 d, no difference was found in total biomass between treated and control microcosms. The results of this study suggest that creosote does not pose a significant direct risk to phytoplankton at concentrations likely to be encountered in most contaminated aquatic environments; however, stimulation of algal populations could occur in situations of long-term chronic exposure or spill events that remove predatory zooplankton populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".