An inversion method based on multi-angular approaches for estimating bare soil surface parameters from RADARSAT-1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The radar signal recorded by earth observation (EO) satellites is known to be sensitive to soil moisture and soil surface roughness, which influence the onset of runoff. This paper focuses on the inversion of these parameters using a multi-angular approach based on RADARSAT-1 data with incidence angles of 35° and 47° (in mode S3 and S7). This inversion was done based on three backscatter models: Geometrical Optics Model (GOM), Oh Model (OM) and Modified Dubois Model (MDM), which are compared in order to obtain the best configuration. For roughness expressed in rms of heights, mean absolute errors of 1.23 cm, 1.12 cm and 2.08 cm, and for dielectric constant, mean absolute errors of 2.46, 4.95 and 3.31 were obtained for the MDM, GOM and the OM simulation, respectively. This means that the MDM provided the best results with minimum errors. Based on these results, the latter inversion algorithm was applied on the images and the final results are presented in two different maps showing pixel and homogeneous zones for surface roughness and soil moisture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".