MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232925706 · doi:10.1109/memea.2015.7145160

Table of contents

2015· article· en· W4232925706 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Cancer InstituteIstituto Nazionale di Ricerca MetrologicaMasarykova UniverzitaUniversity of MissouriXiamen UniversityUniversität BremenUniversity College LondonUniversitat Rovira i VirgiliSapienza Università di RomaShenyang Institute of AutomationTurun YliopistoVysoké Učení Technické v BrněChinese Academy of SciencesISCTE – Instituto Universitário de LisboaUniversity of SheffieldIstituto Italiano di TecnologiaUniversity of Tennessee, KnoxvillePolitecnico di TorinoInstitute of Automation, Chinese Academy of SciencesOttawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesUniversità degli Studi di CagliariUniversità degli Studi Roma TreNazarbayev UniversityUniversità degli Studi di SalernoUniversity of OttawaSoutheast UniversityUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico IIMissouri University of Science and TechnologyUniversità della CalabriaUniversità degli Studi di Padova
KeywordsTable (database)Computer scienceDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The following topics are dealt with: Gaussian mixture modeling; statistical analysis; high-resolution CT imaging; diffuse pulmonary diseases; spatiotemporal video processing; respiratory rate estimation; fMRI data; automated hippocampus segmentation; voice controlled ambient assisted living system; neurofeedback cognitive enhancement; arterial blood pressure; elasticity properties; lung tumor living cells; and cancer detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.383
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionFrench-language works237,207