MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232962115 · doi:10.1017/s0714980815000331

CJG volume 34 issue 4 Cover and Front matter

2015· article· en· W4232962115 on OpenAlexaff
Rédactrice en chef, Margaret J. Penning, Michel Bédard, Martine Lagacé, Laura Funk

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicDiverse Scientific and Economic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of WaterlooLakehead UniversityConestoga CollegeUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFront coverCover (algebra)Volume (thermodynamics)Front (military)Computer scienceContent (measure theory)Action (physics)Environmental scienceEngineeringMathematicsPhysicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Publiée tous les trimestres en mars, juin, septembre et décembre par l'Association canadienne de gérontologie L'adhésion à l'ACG (175,00 $) inclut un abonnement à la revue (www. cagacg.ca).S'il vous plaît, notez que le premier mai est la date de renouvellement annuel de l'ACG.Les adhésions seront au pro rata jusqu'à la date de renouvellement annuel suivant.Membres de l'ACG, inscription 175 $ (www.cagacg.ca)comprend un abonnement à la revue Abonnement annuel : (+ 5% TPS) Canada / EU et autres pays (US$/UK£) Personnel 105 $/53 £ (sur papier) Étudiants 28 $/14 £ (sur papier) Institutions 290 $/145 £ (sur papier); 250 $/125 £ (en ligne); 308 $/155 £ (les deux) (Payer seulement par chèque personnel, VISA, MC et AMEX)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.806

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4350.257

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissementSame topicDiverse Scientific and Economic StudiesFrench-language works237,207