Photodissociation of superexcited states of hydrogen iodide: A photofragment imaging study using resonant multiphoton excitation at 13.39 and 15.59 eV
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jet-cooled HI has been excited using a resonant three-photon excitation scheme to energies corresponding to 13.39 and 15.59 eV. Analysis of velocity mapping images of the iodine atom fragments allowed the identification of the HI excited states at these energies as the (4Σ1/2) 6p superexcited state and the repulsive 4Σ1/2 state of HI+, respectively. Following excitation at 13.39 eV, we observe formation of iodine atomic fragments through the H(2S) + I[(3PJ) 6p] (J = 0, 1, 2) fragment channels, as well as through the H(2S) + I[(1D2) 6p] channel. This observation is explained by extensive nonadiabatic interactions between the (4Σ1/2) 6p state with the repulsive (4Π1/2) 6p state and the weakly bound (A 2Σ+) 6p state. In support for this proposed dissociation mechanism excitation of the corresponding ionic 4Σ1/2 state at 15.59 eV also results in formation of comparable quantities of I+ in its 1D2, 3P0,1, and 3P2 levels indicating again extensive nonadiabatic interactions with other repulsive curves. A similar mechanism based on the local interaction of the 4Σ1/2 state with the A 2Σ+ and the 4Π1/2 state is proposed. PACS Nos.: 82.50F, 32.80R
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it