MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4233215929 · doi:10.23952/jano.1.2019.2.01

A special issue dedicated to Boris Polyak

2019· article· en· W4233215929 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Boris Polyak', Avneesh Agrawal, Shane Barratt, Stephen Boyd, Enzo Busseti, Walaa M. Moursi, Alexandra Smirnova

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied and Numerical Optimization · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicFusion and Plasma Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This special issue aims to honor Professor Boris Polyak's outstanding scientific contributions to the field of optimization by collecting some of the most recent advancements in optimization and its applications.During the last six decades, Professor Boris Polyak made fundamental contributions to various aspects of deterministic and stochastic optimization.Professor Boris Polyak is an original and brilliant mathematician, who put forth numerous novel ideas and concepts that strengthen all branches of optimization.His well-known book on optimization has educated generations of researchers, and his heavily cited papers provide a wealth of innovative ideas.This special issue is comprised of seven articles of high scientific merits whose contribution we summarise in the following:A. Agrawal, S. Barratt, S. Boyd, E. Busseti, and W. M. Moursi, in the paper entitled "Differentiating Through a Cone Program," consider the problem of efficiently computing the derivative of the solution map of a convex cone program.They implicitly differentiate the residual map for the homogeneous self-dual embedding and solve the linear systems of equations by employing an iterative method.This permits the authors to compute the derivative operator and its adjoint effectively.An open-source Python implementation of the new method solves a cone program and returns the derivative and its adjoint as abstract linear maps.The objective of the article entitled "A Henig conical regularization approach for circumventing the Slater conundrum in linearly ℓ p + -constrained least-squares problems" by L. Huerga, A. A. Khan and M. Sama is to explore a linearly ℓ p + -constrained least-squares problem.The authors develop a Henig conical regularization approach as a unified framework to deal with the lack of Slater-type constraint qualification.They provide some stability estimates for the regularized problems.For the separable case, p ∈ [1, ∞), they give an explicit characterization of the Henig dilating cones associated with ℓ p +

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.861
Threshold uncertainty score0.465

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1390.095

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied and Numerical Optimization→Same topicFusion and Plasma Physics Studies→French-language works237,207→