Instability and Transition in a Separation Bubble Under a Three-Dimensional Freestream Pressure Distribution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents measurements of the instability and transition processes in separation bubbles under a three-dimensional freestream pressure distribution. The measurements are performed on a flat plate on which a pressure distribution is imposed by a contoured surface facing the flat test-surface. The three-dimensional pressure distribution that is established on the test-surface approximates the pressure distributions encountered on swept blades. This type of pressure field produces crossflows in the laminar boundary layer upstream of the separation and within the separation bubble. The effects of these crossflows on the instability of the upstream boundary layer and on the instability, transition onset, and transition rate within the separated shear-layer are examined. The measurements are performed at two flow-Reynolds numbers and relatively low level of freestream turbulence. The results of this experimental study show that the three-dimensional freestream pressure field and the corresponding redistribution of the freestream flow can cause significant spanwise variation in the separation-bubble structure. It is demonstrated that the instability and transition processes in the modified separation bubble develop on the basis of the same fundamentals as in two-dimensional separation bubbles and can be predicted with the same level of accuracy using models that have been developed for two-dimensional separation bubbles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".