MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233476864 · doi:10.1002/bbb.348

Erratum: A review of biomass densification systems to develop uniform feedstock commodities for bioenergy application

2011· review· en· W4233476864 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jaya Shankar Tumuluru, Christopher T. Wright, J. Richard Hess, Kevin Kenney

Bibliographic record

VenueBiofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRaw materialBiomass (ecology)BriquetteTable (database)MathematicsLibrary scienceAgricultural scienceEngineeringForestryGeographyEnvironmental scienceWaste managementAgronomyComputer scienceBiologyDatabaseEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After online publication of this article on October 6, 2011, the authors have noticed the following reference errors within the paper, which is in this current issue (Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref. 5:683–707): Page 684: Reference 5 should be replaced with Reference 77, Tumuluru JS, Sokhansanj S, Lim CJ, Bi X, Anthony L, Staffan M, Sowlati T and Ehsan O, Quality of wood pellets produced in British Columbia. App Eng Agr 26:1013–1020 (2010b). Table 1: Reference 145 should be replaced with Reference 149, Shimida Systems [Online]. Available at: http://www.shimada.co.uk/index.php [July 20, 2011]. Table 4: Reference 10 should be Mani S, A system analysis of biomass densification process: PhD thesis submitted to Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (2005). Page 692: Reference 64 refers to Shaw's MS thesis rather than PhD thesis. Page 693: Reference 77 should be replaced with Reference 135, Tumuluru JS, Tabil LG, Opoku A, Mosqueda MR and Fadeyi O, Effect of process variables on the quality characteristics of pelleted wheat distiller's dried grains with soluble (DDGS). Bio Eng 105:466–475 (2010d). Table 6: Reference 27 should be Adapa PK, Tabil LG and Schoenau G, Compression characteristics of non-treated and steam exploded barley, canola, oat, and wheat straw grinds. App Eng Agr 26:617–632 (2010). Page 699: Reference 77 should be replaced with Reference 133, Tumuluru JS, Kuang X, Sokhansanj S, Lim CJ, Bi X and Staffan M, Development of laboratory studies on the off-gassing of wood pellets. Can Bio Eng 52:8.1–8.9 (2010c). Page 699: Reference 133 should be replaced with Reference 5, Tumuluru JS, Wright CT, Kenney KL and Hess JR, A review on biomass densification technologies for energy applications. [Online]. Tech. Report INL/EXT-10-18420, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho, USA (2010). Available at: http://www.inl.gov/bioenergy [June 22, 2011].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiofuels Bioproducts and BiorefiningSame topicBiofuel production and bioconversionFrench-language works237,207